In 2005 the National Park Service completed a Cultural Landscapes Inventory on the Thomason/Barker Ranch (known better generally as just Barker Ranch) as part of a continuing effort of cataloging the cultural resources of the Death Valley area. The resulting 77-page report included chapters on the chronology and physical history of the ranch, geographic information, an analysis and evaluation of the ranch's integrity, and ended with a determination that the ranch should be preserved and maintained and that it was eligible for listing on the National Register.
Portions of the report of interest to readers of this blog have been reprinted below.
The front page of the report
National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2005
Thomason/Barker Ranch
Death Valley National Park
"The 1930s witnessed an unprecedented migration of people desiring to escape urban life in order to experience a simpler and less restrictive existence in the remote desert. Others moved to the desert at this time in order to escape the consequences of the Depression by trying to eke out a living on the land rather than face urban soup lines. Since the 1930s the California deserts have provided a sanctuary for those seeking to escape from mainstream society. People have often been attracted to the secluded and wild environment that the desert provided because it created a feeling of isolation and freedom among those who were avoiding the law, those who wished to live away from other people, or for those who simply did not want to conform to conventional society. The desert attracted people who held to the belief that it was one of the last American Frontiers -- offering the maximum amount of freedom from social order and legal constraints. People of this mindset have settled in or drifted in and out of the Goler Wash vicinity over the past 70 years.
"It was during this initial era of escape to the desert that the Thomason/Barker Ranch was first settled. In 1937, Bluch and Helen Thomason, a retired couple from Los Angeles, moved to Goler Wash after filing a claim with Inyo County for a five acre mill site. This was the land on which they subsequently built their retirement retreat. As required under the General Mining Act of 1872, the development and use of residences on Government Law Office (GLO) managed lands depended on the owners' ability to show proof of their active use of the land for mining activities. The Thomasons' primary reason for moving to Goler Wash was to retire in the desert, and they used the provisions of the Mining Act of 1872 as a means to this end. For the same reason, the Barkers, who acquired mining rights to the ranch in 1956, moved to the area because of their attraction to the desert and their desire to retire in a secluded environment. They also used their mining claims as a means to legally occupy the government-owned land. This was substantiated by the testimony of Emmett Harder, a local resident and prospector who knew the Barkers during the period they lived in Goler Wash.
"The Thomasons and the Barkers were not the only families who used mining claims as the basis for developing recreational ranches in this area. Four other families maintained retreats in the Goler Wash area, and a similar number developed retreats in nearby Butte Valley in the 1930s and 1940s. Like the Thomason/Barker Ranch, these residences were located on GLO-administered lands and were also legally occupied due to the owners' association with small-scale mining.
"In 1968, the Barkers ceased living on their ranch, and by 1971 they had completely abandoned the site. Many of the other family retreats in the area had been abandoned by this time as well. The exception was the Myers Ranch, which had been successfully patented under the General Mining Act of 1872 a decade earlier. Today, the Myers property has been completely reconstructed following a devastating fire, and its physical structures retain no historic integrity. It is, however, the only residential complex in the area that remains a family-controlled retreat.
"The Thomason/Barker Ranch reverted to BLM [Bureau of Land Management] management in 1971. Since that time, tourists and outdoor enthusiasts have used the area as an overnight destination. Despite decades of benign neglect, most of the buildings and structures remain intact but are in poor condition. As such, the Thomason/Barker Ranch serves as the only remaining example of a primitive recreational ranch and retirement retreat in Death Valley National Park."
Above: the site plan of the Barker Ranch
Below: a chronological history of the ranch
Above: the site plan of the Barker Ranch
Below: a chronological history of the ranch
Besides covering the entire history of the ranch the report also has a lengthy summary of the activities of Charles Manson and his associates during their time in the area:
Charles Manson Family (1968-1969)
"The fall of 1968, the peaceful history of Thomason/Barker Ranch was forever changed when Charles Manson obtained permission from Arlene Barker to indefinitely occupy the ranch with his "Family." During this era, many of those labeled by the media as hippies and others associated with the counter culture were seeking solace and escape from the pressures of modern society. For these individuals, the secluded environs of Death Valley, like other remote areas, represented an alluring sanctuary far removed from the repressive trappings of the urban "establishment." In the eyes of many long-time Death Valley residents accustomed to the idiosyncrasies of prospectors and desert rats, the Manson Family appeared on the surface no more unconventional than other newcomers who frequented the desert byways and canyons.
"Favorable descriptions of Goler Wash were provided to Manson by 17-year-old Cathy Gillies, a recently inducted Family member and grandchild of Barbara Myers. Agreeing that the location would likely meet their needs, the Manson Family began a phased move to Goler Wash. The first of many forays to Goler Wash consisted of seventeen adults and two babies, journeying from Los Angeles in a reconditioned school bus. They hiked the arduous last five miles from the mouth of the canyon to the Myers Ranch, their original destination. Their school bus would later be driven to the Thomason/Barker Ranch by way of the eastern route over Mengel Pass, an equally challenging and (for the bus at any rate) debilitating accomplishment. Manson eventually selected Thomason/ Barker Ranch rather than the Myers Ranch as the Family's base of operations. He went so far as to seek Arlene Barker's permission to stay at the ranch, deluding her that he was the composer/arranger for the Beach Boys musical group and only intended to stay there a short while with a few others. He later offered to buy the improvements from her, but his inability to demonstrate his financial wherewithal quickly brought an end to the negotiations.
"Charles "Tex" Watson, a member of the Manson Family currently serving a life-term in prison for the Tate-LaBianca murders, described his initial perception of Goler Wash and the Barker and Myers Ranches when the family first arrived in 1968:
"The wash, even by day…. was unbelievably rugged. It could take a good half a day to work your way up on foot, and even the toughest jeep would have a hard time against the boulders and narrow turns. The ranches themselves were about a quarter of a mile apart. Myers Ranch was in very bad condition, rundown and vandalized, but Thomason/Barker Ranch had a solid little stone ranch house and a swimming pool, even sheets on the beds. Later the the place would be described as derelict and dilapidated, but we had less exacting standards." (*)
"The secluded desert setting was conductive to Manson's ultimate objectives of inculcating his followers with his bizarre messianic prophecies of "Helter Skelter," the notion that an imminent race war between blacks and whites would consume the nation. According to his beliefs, he and the Family, as the chosen elite, would weather the violence in a subterranean world in the desert. They would consequently emerge and take control of the black population whom he considered inferior but who would be the initial victors of the race war.
"It was while they were living at Thomason/Barker Ranch that members of the Manson Family made a foray back to Los Angeles and murdered pregnant actress Sharon Tate and four of her house guests. Then, in the same night, they entered another home and killed Leno and Rosemary LaBianca. The Tate-LaBianca murders would cause mass fear and paranoia among Los Angeles residents who could not begin to predict when the next murder might occur or who the next victims would be.
"In September 1969, about one month after the still unsolved Tate-LaBianca murders, members of the Manson Family were apprehended by a team of California Highway Patrol, Inyo County, and NPS law enforcement personnel at Thomason/Barker Ranch on suspicion of theft and arson, ending their year-long occupation of the ranch. It wasn't until the Manson Family was incarcerated that the magnitude and horror of their violent acts were fully revealed.
"During the Manson Family occupation of the ranch, the entry roundabout area was expanded to the west to create more parking space for the bus and the dozens of other vehicles that the group had acquired. Because they were only at the ranch for a short period of time, the physical character of the site did not differ greatly from when the Barkers inhabited it. There are accounts that the Manson Family used the swimming pool as a giant makeshift washing machine and that they vandalized and left extensive debris throughout the site when they were incarcerated, but other than the expanded parking area, no permanent change to the character of the site occurred."
(* Watson is clearly confusing the two ranches here. GS)
The main buildings of the Barker Ranch were destroyed by a fire accidentally ignited by a careless visitor in May of 2009. Not only did the ranch itself go up in smoke, but so did the tens of thousands of dollars that the National Park Service had spent restoring the ranch to a condition suitable to its historical significance. Today, all that remains of the structures are the bunkhouse, the chicken coop, and the stone walls of the main house and its outbuildings.
* * *
The main buildings of the Barker Ranch were destroyed by a fire accidentally ignited by a careless visitor in May of 2009. Not only did the ranch itself go up in smoke, but so did the tens of thousands of dollars that the National Park Service had spent restoring the ranch to a condition suitable to its historical significance. Today, all that remains of the structures are the bunkhouse, the chicken coop, and the stone walls of the main house and its outbuildings.
Above: the ruins of the Barker Ranch house, April 25, 2015
Below: a National Park Service sign at Barker Ranch
George Stimson,
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for this blog post, and spending so much time reproducing the relevant sections of the Report. It's fascinating!
I am angry at the stupid **** who accidentally set Barkers on fire. It never fails to amaze me the damage that people do when they are unused to living in rural locations. I am also annoyed at the caretaker who destroyed the Family bus. Perhaps he didn't want Manson researchers making their way out there to view it!
Who has responsibility for policing the National Park? It is Federal officers or the Sheriff's department?
Since the passage of the Desert Protection Act of 1994 Barker Ranch has been a part of Death Valley National Park. Thus it is under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service.
ReplyDeleteThis is very, very self-serving and totally off-topic, but just in case anyone was interested about the concerns I raised about Bobby's works being displayed in an Australian art gallery (I am an Australian, and the controversy the exhibition has the potential to ignite might create problems for my country's government etc.), I posted the email I sent to Contemporary Art Australia in the comments section for 'Bobby has a gallery showing' (https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8171370990642927748&postID=8236016960863415808&page=1&token=1432220012029). It's a really long email so I won't mind if noone reads it, was just worried anyone who MIGHT be interested (all one of you!) might miss it because that article has slipped down the front page quite a bit.
ReplyDeleteSo sorry for derailing the comments! I'm a history obsessive & I've always loved reading about Barker Ranch so I can't wait to dig into this one tomorrow (off to bed right now). Cheers!
My apologies for going completely off topic but I have to thank Robert Hendrickson for the wonderful autographed gift package a thank you letter is also on the way & Jenn thanks so much for helping make it happen & of course my bud Matt
ReplyDelete:-)
ReplyDeleteEnjoy them, William. And please do so in the very best of health!
ReplyDeleteGeorge Stimson: Thanks for that info!
ReplyDeleteWilliam Marshall: I am so pleased that Robert H came through for you. I hope you are keeping well at the moment, and that you enjoy your goodies!
Vermouth: I am off to read your email!
equinox thank you friend I see my Cancer doctor tomorrow hoping to know more than
ReplyDeleteThanks again Matt sorry I honesty didn't see your comment earlier
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI saw a book in Shoshone called Death Valley Cabins that has a good write up about the history of the ranch. I think George's history would have been great for that book as well.
ReplyDeleteAs for burning down Barker, there has been several fires in those canyons. Myers Ranch also burned and was rebuilt. And then in 5 canyons down, the Wicht/Novak Camp was also burned down. I believe there have also been fires in other cayons as well.
It's really sad that anyone would want to burn any of these old cabins, Manson history aside - these canyons contain much richer history than Manson!
Ahh - FIRE it can BURN you, but try living without it. It can cleanse the forest of fallen trees, purge the caves of your enemies and even convert worthless DEAD bodies into useful ASH.
ReplyDeleteIt is SOOO easy to SEE the destructive (BAD) nature in things, BUT to recognize the positive that emerges from negativity - NOT so easy.
When CM saw pictures of the freshly burned Myers Ranch he remarked on how clean everything looked.
ReplyDeleteSorry to derail again, but the gallery got back to me and I posted their email & my reactions (I haven't emailed them back, I just ranted on the blog, lol) in the other thread ('Bobby has a gallery showing'). Swear this is the last time I'll derail this thread! Fingers crossed, hope to die, stick a needle in my eye. ;)
ReplyDeleteThe burning is sad for us, of course, and as Cuntry points out, there is such a wealth of historical interest in that area beyond even the Manson connection - but - those flames are very much in keeping with the whole via negativa of the Manson story; it emerged from the desert, did its thing, and now, before answering any of our questions, it slowly disappears, dies off, withdraws from us, silently back into the wilderness it sprang from. If it is sad or regrettable, it is at least apt.
ReplyDeleteAnd I meant to say, thank you Mr Stimson, a very interesting post.
ReplyDeleteVery well Done George!
ReplyDeleteIt was very apparent how much respect and affection you had for this area. As well, unfortunately for me, how comfortable you were driving down into this area to get to Barker Ranch ;)
For me personally, the biggest take away from my voyage out to Barker was the enormity of the task it must have been for them in the late 60's to get there in an old bus.
Walking or hiking in that area in bare feet?
Wow... just wow
Well, they brought the bus in via Mengel Pass. Think about Kitty and Stephanie for example going down that wash on foot trying to get to Ballarat which is still another 15 miles on dirt road AFTER you hit the bottom - in the autumn heat! Mind blowing.
ReplyDeleteVery good Michael, now what is the relevance of the Barker Ranch story to the Palmyra, Syria ISIS story ?
ReplyDeleteOooooh Robert....
ReplyDeleteWhat a question.
You set my brain buzzing - which is usually a sign that some pre-installed software up there isn't liking where I'm taking it. Listen, I cannot give you an answer; I simply don't trust my mind, or my opinions. But I want to know what you are saying. When I started joining in on this site I admit I thought you were a few dimes short of the entrance fee, if you know what I mean. I was profoundly foolish and arrogant to think that, and I regret it. I was dead wrong. But half of me is relieved that you are frequently cryptic, because sometimes I feel that if you were more forthright and plain-spoken it would be damned uncomfortable for creatures of comfort like me.
Why don't you email me what I need to know?
I do need to understand.
That's a tough one - for words - Michael.
ReplyDeleteI don't think there is ANYTHING anyone NEEDS to KNOW, but an understanding of how ALL things RELATE and thus are RELEVANT unto each other seems to provide for a more enjoyable MENTAL experience while dwelling for an extended period of time here on this earth.
As an artist you might try painting a picture of a thousand year old Palmyra "ruin" but also incorporate an image of the burned-out Barker Ranch house into the picture.
THUS, you will have created a picture WORTH a thousand YEARS and a stimulating MENTAL experience for the viewer.
You can step into Myers, or even Barker when the house was still standing, and really if you did not know you were 25 miles from pavement, you could imagine yourself in a small town like Shoshone, Joshua Tree, etc, in a well kept area. The NPS and the people did a good job keeping those areas up and clean. I have only seen Myers Ranch pre-burn, and it looked like an absolute utopia - at least my vision of utopia.
ReplyDeleteI am assuming that back when they were up there in 68/9, that the cabins had a few years of neglect onto them.
As for getting the bus up there, from what I understand there was once a road that ran past Myers ranch, through that canyon to Willow Spring, and then cut back around that mountain that lies behind Barker and back to the Mengel Pass (or even lower to Butte), and that was the route they took the bus - not up Mengel or Goler like many assumed.
According to lore, the Manson people also spent time at the Warm Springs cabin as well up in Jail Canyon in those cabins.
BLM has been known to burn down structures in the surrrounding areas I'm a near by resident and a friend of mine had his cabin set on fire by BLM. Or at least this is what he suspects after 2 years of being harassed by BLM rangers, and after being away from the property for a 3 week period he came home to ash.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteQuotes from the NPS publication:
ReplyDelete"Manson eventually selected Thomason/ Barker Ranch rather than the Myers Ranch as the Family's base of operations."
"Charles "Tex" Watson... described his initial perception of ... Myers Ranches when the family first arrived in 1968:
"... The ranches themselves were about a quarter of a mile apart. Myers Ranch was in very bad condition, rundown and vandalized..."
So presumably Myers was too trashy for even the Mansonoids to live in. Yet in the book 'Desert Shadows' by Bob Murphy,former Superintendent of Death Valley National Monument, we read (re the Barker Raid):
pg101
"The officers checked the nearby Myers Ranch. The location had obviously been cleaned up. The floors were neat and the bed made with the bedspread carefully tucked over the top. No Family items were found. Charlie told the arresting officers that the Family avoided the Myers Ranch because "the ghost of Bill Myers still lived there."
Sure doesn't sound like it's in "very bad condition" to me! Given the critical need for housing all the visitors and Family members up there, was there another reason they didn't avail themselves of the Myers ranch? I suspect the Myers cabin WAS occupied. But for some reason this person's name has to be kept a secret. Was it somebody sent up there to keep the Family under observation? Given the way the Family was kept under constant surveillance by this time, I think that is a likely scenario. But why are the Family protecting this person's name?