I read years ago that someone (I wish I can remember who) said that what surprised him most about Spahn Ranch was the amount of redheaded girls there. When asked about it, Charlie said redheads were easily manipulated.
What year was this foto made ?? still in ,,Family Periode,, ?? Or long after ?? Who are the other girls#kidds ?? Kitty looks okay , but there is no way I can guess her age here.....
@Jason-years ago on Bobby & his wife's site they had a Q&A section where one would type their question & Barbara would mail them to him or ask him over the phone & then she would reply for him. I asked him if he knew his daughter with Kitty & he said he did know her & kept in touch with her.
AustinAnn, It looks like you picked up some of the background and dropped it on the kids to hide their faces. I don't think I could have resisted using the dog's face instead.
Wow! How the heck did you get this one? Has Kitty all the sudden become a friend of the blog and decided to send in some snapshots? (I don't really think this.....) Looks like a Kodak print from sometime from the mid 70's, judging from the rounded corners. Most of my early childhood pictures were the same type of prints.
CarolMR said... I read years ago that someone (I wish I can remember who) said that what surprised him most about Spahn Ranch was the amount of redheaded girls there. When asked about it, Charlie said redheads were easily manipulated.
thanks, Zara. Helter Skelter Forum sent out the following mass email today:
"Rival Forums Poaching Info:
We here at the HSForum are honored and thrilled that our nearest and dearest rivals are poaching our info and pictures and documents. In fact, we say good luck to you. The information out there about this 43- nearly 44- year old murder case is not exclusive to any online community. We post it for YOUR pleasure. We pay for it, so you can have all the information available as you all research this fascinating case.
We do not scan pages of books into our forum and watermark them as our own. Nope. That would be stupid. We didn't write any books about the case to claim copyright.
Yes, we did watermark some of the things we paid money to buy, such as Abigail Folger's documents (which have been on here for three years) but now... well we couldn't give a fuck that our nearest and dearest have mastered the art of removing a watermark after three years. It took you long enough :)
I concur. Liz doesn't listen to anyone, about anything, under any circumstances...
Thanks a fucking lie! I always listen to you, Patty, AAnne and Deb. You especially Matt. Your such a liar. I call you at least once a month for your advice on how to not kill my boss. I said good day!
I know where AustinAnn got that pic. It wasn't anywhere near HSF. Zara is a sorry-ass-english-as-a-second-language-band-wagon-jumping-fifth-grade-educated-velveeta-eating-idiot.
33 comments:
I read years ago that someone (I wish I can remember who) said that what surprised him most about Spahn Ranch was the amount of redheaded girls there. When asked about it, Charlie said redheads were easily manipulated.
^That would have been me then -_-.
But Kitty looks GORGEOUS! Love her with long hair!!
Scotland has a greater percentage of redheads than any other country. I saw it on the internet so, it has to be true.
are the children blurred out in the picture her's?
I wonder if Bobby ever talks to/sees his child with Kitty?
What year was this foto made ?? still in ,,Family Periode,, ?? Or long after ?? Who are the other girls#kidds ?? Kitty looks okay , but there is no way I can guess her age here.....
@Jason-years ago on Bobby & his wife's site they had a Q&A section where one would type their question & Barbara would mail them to him or ask him over the phone & then she would reply for him. I asked him if he knew his daughter with Kitty & he said he did know her & kept in touch with her.
Jason- Yeah, in one of Bobbys parole hearings he mentioned how they keep in touch.
AustinAnn,
It looks like you picked up some of the background and dropped it on the kids to hide their faces. I don't think I could have resisted using the dog's face instead.
I didn't do anything to the photo. I found it like that!
Wow! How the heck did you get this one? Has Kitty all the sudden become a friend of the blog and decided to send in some snapshots? (I don't really think this.....) Looks like a Kodak print from sometime from the mid 70's, judging from the rounded corners. Most of my early childhood pictures were the same type of prints.
yeah, whoever posted this could at least tell from where he stole it
Zara,
Crawl back under the rock from which you came. That is a 50 year old picture and freely available on Google Images. You are a stupid bitch.
Well said, Matt, well said!!
50 years old, that would make it pre-Bobby. I thought it was after-Bobby. Whenever it was, the girl was mighty pretty.
To me she looks 12-13 years old in this shot.
It's hard to tell with Kitty. There is that recent picture where she hasn't aged much since the 60's.
I have an update on her: she's doing quite well, as she teaches marine biology and math! I won't say where and for who but she's doing awesome.
And still cute after all these years. Thanks, Lauren.
Makes sense that she's a teacher, as the recent, sans mandolin picture screams "This is a class picture!"
CarolMR said...
I read years ago that someone (I wish I can remember who) said that what surprised him most about Spahn Ranch was the amount of redheaded girls there. When asked about it, Charlie said redheads were easily manipulated.
Pffff I am a redhead and not easily manipulated!
eviliz said...
Pffff I am a redhead and not easily manipulated!
I concur. Liz doesn't listen to anyone, about anything, under any circumstances...
thanks, Zara. Helter Skelter Forum sent out the following mass email today:
"Rival Forums Poaching Info:
We here at the HSForum are honored and thrilled that our nearest and dearest rivals are poaching our info and pictures and documents. In fact, we say good luck to you. The information out there about this 43- nearly
44- year old murder case is not exclusive to any online community. We post it for YOUR pleasure. We pay for it, so you can have all the information available as you all research this fascinating case.
We do not scan pages of books into our forum and watermark them as our own.
Nope. That would be stupid. We didn't write any books about the case to claim copyright.
Yes, we did watermark some of the things we paid money to buy, such as Abigail Folger's documents (which have been on here for three years) but now... well we couldn't give a fuck that our nearest and dearest have mastered the art of removing a watermark after three years. It took you long enough :)
Our info is YOUR info. Enjoy it, folks."
Well said, SJ.
HS Forum is a hive of scum and villany. Fuck them.
Matt said...
eviliz said...
Pffff I am a redhead and not easily manipulated!
I concur. Liz doesn't listen to anyone, about anything, under any circumstances...
Thanks a fucking lie! I always listen to you, Patty, AAnne and Deb.
You especially Matt. Your such a liar. I call you at least once a month for your advice on how to not kill my boss.
I said good day!
Matt said...
Zara,
Crawl back under the rock from which you came. That is a 50 year old picture and freely available on Google Images. You are a stupid bitch.
ColScott said...
HS Forum is a hive of scum and villany. Fuck them.
:0 LMAO so fresh you boys are.
you deserve spankings!
I say that 85% of the time we credit the other blogs we poach from. Our bad if this time we forgot. We love the HS Forum as well as Cielo Dr.com.
I know where AustinAnn got that pic. It wasn't anywhere near HSF. Zara is a sorry-ass-english-as-a-second-language-band-wagon-jumping-fifth-grade-educated-velveeta-eating-idiot.
If I could steal from you, I would try to steal from every one of you. If that's guilt, I accept it!
Wow, Matt, lets leave velveeta out of it! :)
Post a Comment