Yeh, I hear you, Whut. I have a thing for rotary phones and shag carpeting too. ------------------------------------ Matt, you made me laugh....... I like the 3rd from the top.
I am trying do decide if that is a shadow, a mole or a dingleberry on the top of her ass crack in photo four. And man, those hands are huge. They are like the man-hands in Seinfeld. And the photo three hands are even worse. Such a beautiful woman, but I don't think those bottom two photos are flattering at all.
Leary, I remember reading that Sharon usually didn't wear rings because she didn't want to draw attention to her hands. Not because they were big, but because she was a nail-biter. Marilyn Monroe didn't wear rings because she didn't like her hands, either.
People making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty!
People making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty!
People making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty! --------------------------------- The word of the day is levity.
I will go out on a limb here and admit that I never found her particularly attractive. Certainly not ugly, but not my cup of tea. I also didn't find her particularly talented as an actress and was always puzzled that she even made it to the level she did.
rfoster1 said... I will go out on a limb here and admit that I never found her particularly attractive. Certainly not ugly, but not my cup of tea. I also didn't find her particularly talented as an actress and was always puzzled that she even made it to the level she did. ____________________________
I totally agree. IMO she always looked way older than her age, even her teen pics. I bet she wouldn't have aged well.
I like the one at the top best. I must be getting old.
ReplyDeleteYeh, I hear you, Whut. I have a thing for rotary phones and shag carpeting too.
ReplyDeleteMatt said...
ReplyDeleteYeh, I hear you, Whut. I have a thing for rotary phones and shag carpeting too.
------------------------------------
Matt, you made me laugh.......
I like the 3rd from the top.
I am trying do decide if that is a shadow, a mole or a dingleberry on the top of her ass crack in photo four. And man, those hands are huge. They are like the man-hands in Seinfeld. And the photo three hands are even worse. Such a beautiful woman, but I don't think those bottom two photos are flattering at all.
ReplyDeleteMatt said... Yeh, I hear you, Whut. I have a thing for rotary phones and shag carpeting too.
ReplyDeleteThere's a rotary phone and shag caepeting? :)
She reminds me of Debra in the first :/
ReplyDeleteShe looks way to thin in last to pics you can see her ribcage still a beautiful woman
ReplyDeleteSuch a tragedy
leary7 said...
ReplyDeleteI am trying do decide if that is a shadow, a mole or a dingleberry on the top of her ass crack in photo four.
I was wondering what it was too, I say dingleberry. lmao
Leary, I remember reading that Sharon usually didn't wear rings because she didn't want to draw attention to her hands. Not because they were big, but because she was a nail-biter. Marilyn Monroe didn't wear rings because she didn't like her hands, either.
ReplyDeleteshe was so pretty but to me always looked older than she really was.
ReplyDeleteA big ole' ass pimple?
ReplyDeletenever saw the bottomr two before, where are they froM
ReplyDeletePeople making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty!
ReplyDeletePeople making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty!
ReplyDeleteIt looks like a bruise. And I would kill for that body. Keep in mind I said kill, not exercise.
ReplyDeleteI believe her hands look big because she is so thin.
AustinAnn74 said...
ReplyDeletePeople making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty!
---------------------------------
The word of the day is levity.
i dont care about the pimple or whatever it is, she looks damned fine!
ReplyDeleteI will go out on a limb here and admit that I never found her particularly attractive. Certainly not ugly, but not my cup of tea. I also didn't find her particularly talented as an actress and was always puzzled that she even made it to the level she did.
ReplyDeleterfoster1 said...
ReplyDeleteI will go out on a limb here and admit that I never found her particularly attractive. Certainly not ugly, but not my cup of tea. I also didn't find her particularly talented as an actress and was always puzzled that she even made it to the level she did.
____________________________
I totally agree. IMO she always looked way older than her age, even her teen pics. I bet she wouldn't have aged well.