Yeh, I hear you, Whut. I have a thing for rotary phones and shag carpeting too. ------------------------------------ Matt, you made me laugh....... I like the 3rd from the top.
I am trying do decide if that is a shadow, a mole or a dingleberry on the top of her ass crack in photo four. And man, those hands are huge. They are like the man-hands in Seinfeld. And the photo three hands are even worse. Such a beautiful woman, but I don't think those bottom two photos are flattering at all.
Leary, I remember reading that Sharon usually didn't wear rings because she didn't want to draw attention to her hands. Not because they were big, but because she was a nail-biter. Marilyn Monroe didn't wear rings because she didn't like her hands, either.
People making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty!
People making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty!
People making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty! --------------------------------- The word of the day is levity.
I will go out on a limb here and admit that I never found her particularly attractive. Certainly not ugly, but not my cup of tea. I also didn't find her particularly talented as an actress and was always puzzled that she even made it to the level she did.
rfoster1 said... I will go out on a limb here and admit that I never found her particularly attractive. Certainly not ugly, but not my cup of tea. I also didn't find her particularly talented as an actress and was always puzzled that she even made it to the level she did. ____________________________
I totally agree. IMO she always looked way older than her age, even her teen pics. I bet she wouldn't have aged well.
19 comments:
I like the one at the top best. I must be getting old.
Yeh, I hear you, Whut. I have a thing for rotary phones and shag carpeting too.
Matt said...
Yeh, I hear you, Whut. I have a thing for rotary phones and shag carpeting too.
------------------------------------
Matt, you made me laugh.......
I like the 3rd from the top.
I am trying do decide if that is a shadow, a mole or a dingleberry on the top of her ass crack in photo four. And man, those hands are huge. They are like the man-hands in Seinfeld. And the photo three hands are even worse. Such a beautiful woman, but I don't think those bottom two photos are flattering at all.
Matt said... Yeh, I hear you, Whut. I have a thing for rotary phones and shag carpeting too.
There's a rotary phone and shag caepeting? :)
She reminds me of Debra in the first :/
She looks way to thin in last to pics you can see her ribcage still a beautiful woman
Such a tragedy
leary7 said...
I am trying do decide if that is a shadow, a mole or a dingleberry on the top of her ass crack in photo four.
I was wondering what it was too, I say dingleberry. lmao
Leary, I remember reading that Sharon usually didn't wear rings because she didn't want to draw attention to her hands. Not because they were big, but because she was a nail-biter. Marilyn Monroe didn't wear rings because she didn't like her hands, either.
she was so pretty but to me always looked older than she really was.
A big ole' ass pimple?
never saw the bottomr two before, where are they froM
People making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty!
People making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty!
It looks like a bruise. And I would kill for that body. Keep in mind I said kill, not exercise.
I believe her hands look big because she is so thin.
AustinAnn74 said...
People making comments on the internet are so critical! A pimple on her butt? Give me a break! You people point out the stupidist stuff. Most would love to have a body that pretty!
---------------------------------
The word of the day is levity.
i dont care about the pimple or whatever it is, she looks damned fine!
I will go out on a limb here and admit that I never found her particularly attractive. Certainly not ugly, but not my cup of tea. I also didn't find her particularly talented as an actress and was always puzzled that she even made it to the level she did.
rfoster1 said...
I will go out on a limb here and admit that I never found her particularly attractive. Certainly not ugly, but not my cup of tea. I also didn't find her particularly talented as an actress and was always puzzled that she even made it to the level she did.
____________________________
I totally agree. IMO she always looked way older than her age, even her teen pics. I bet she wouldn't have aged well.
Post a Comment