Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Back Porch Tapes update

From BPT's Facebook


Backporch Tapes 
I got a notice from ebay telling me it was multiple offenses major of posting nude children, Which I DID NOT DO....I never posted anything of Hendrickson period, never and the TOBBIN INTERNATIONAL FILMS thing is bullshit. I don't think You Tube has the balls to come out and say they HAD AND ALLOWED NUDE KIDS ON THERE which I didnt have anyway. I think You Tube is using Tobban to cober it up to save thier ass if the child nudity thing true. I had one photo of the Manson women standing nude with some kids and the parts were cover with a banner...it was them being HIPPIES not them being CHILD MOLESTERS. I also was informed this was by the ATTORNEYS of You Tube...and it a Major offense ....Saying things like they are not responsible and if sued or arrested they not liable. The they throw that Tobban thing up to make it look like something else. You Tube is not being truthful with that. I believe it was the Jewish Jesus who turned me in with her band of idiots. She menetioned the Nudity and how she cant look at it as part of her religion on more than one occasion. The same time it was cancelled out she BLOCKED ME from here on facebook. Its a ATWAR with LIES. I am now ATWAR with LIES TOO and will start showing some lies.....

Poor Michael - Sorry Dude.





44 comments:

  1. This paragraph is damned near incoherent. He must be beside himself. And what's with the Jew talk again?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sounds like he's spent too long talking to that No-Sense Maddox.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I read a bit about it on BPT's facebook page. They had problems with somebody named Yael who is Israeli. They think she was responsible in some way.

    ReplyDelete
  4. From Robert Hendrickson:

    Just a little info on the Back Porch Tapes business:

    I sent YouTube a notice for 4 BPT videos

    (1) involving Diane Sawyer and MANSON footage

    (2) The Manson Family Old News footage where MANSON footage was used,

    (3) The Inside Story Interview where MANSON footage was used and

    (4) The Ron Reagan Show where MANSON footage was used.  All four of these shows are related to past lawsuits or MANSON footage licenses where tens of thousands of dollars were involved. I also served notices on many other YouTubes where 3 were even showing the entire MANSON movie.

    That said, here's the real problem for the dope head dropout behind BackPorch tapes.
    The recent NORWAY bomber / killer wanted to ignite the final Christian / Muslim Armageddon AND his YouTube Mansonite interests are being investigated.  YouTube, a part of the Google billion dollar empire is now panicking and will have a very real problem if the killer saw just one of BackPorches tapes OR the 1973 MANSON on YouTube.  Add to that, Diane Sawyer is ABC's million dollar New's ANCHOR. Then, you have CM trying to get out of prison, via his new famous lawyer, and over a thousand BP tapes look like the whole Manson business is resurfacing.  Frankly, I thought CM was going to have the BackPorch Tapes clown whacked before the new legal process began.

    It may not be so much that 90 people were killed in Norway (Obama could care less), BUT does it also mean that it could happen here and on the 9/11 anniversary as promised by Al-Quada?   "Transformers vs Killers on Camels" coming in 2013 to a theater near you.
    Sorry Charlie, Back Porch Tapes + Norway news and you may be a dead man walking.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh great so now people are trying to blame Charlie for that Norway nutjob doing what he did. Right on! Rather than tackle the causes of what creates these monsters lets put the blame on a man who has been locked up for over 40 years. Now fuck off.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ewwwwwwww. There is a war or transition going on right now. Cm isn't involved & he is mad about it. An ATWA member started a subsid called attar & it's not a pretty & happy bunch. Yael is in this group & they are up to no good. Basically they are young kids with a lot of hate & rage & they use Mansons name just so they can say they belong to a group connected to Manson.....but it's not true. A bunch of kids yelling & screaming over everything. Oh waaa! They are nuts.

    ReplyDelete
  7. That said, here's the real problem for the dope head dropout behind BackPorch tapes.
    hmm this is what hendrickson is calling Micheal from BPT? Micheal who doesnt even drink or use drugs ?RH thats kinda unfair statement to make~ about as absurd as that notion to have some elementary school play act your "secret footage" -lets guess who is the real dopehead now

    ReplyDelete
  8. The four complaints which Mr. Hendrickson filed, are the only reason BPT's was closed. The rest of Hendrickson's email, is just an entertaining fairy tale.
    Youtube would never list Hendrickson's company as the main culprit, unless it were true. Hendrickson's company was plastered all over Mike's videos and channel, for a full day. If it were false information, the legal liability against Youtube would be incredible.
    If you were looking for a scapegoat, would you use Hendrickson? He loves lawsuits. Use your head people!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Conversely, it could be argued that Robert had the only real, legal, defensible claims of everyone who complained. The other complaints about the "nude child" are a bit subjetive, but copyright is copyright. This was the "safe" thing for YouTube to do, there is no denying that copyright was infringed.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I guess we just gotta accept that RH is an old guy. With the kind of old-thought that his (anti)hero Charlie preached against, ironically.

    So a very useful, freely-available & sociologically important resource is destroyed for the sake of making a few hundred dollars selling people DVDs & books at sucker-prices.

    That's sooooooo sixties, maaaaaan!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Correctamundo, Patty. I saw the notice of deletion. It named Tobann four times. I assume one for each complaint. Obviously YT's attorneys agree with RH.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Cease2 is not a Metallica fan then, Patty assumes? Copyright is copyright, man. It's there for a reason.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Cease2 said...

    I guess we just gotta accept that RH is an old guy. With the kind of old-thought that his (anti)hero Charlie preached against, ironically.

    So a very useful, freely-available & sociologically important resource is destroyed for the sake of making a few hundred dollars selling people DVDs & books at sucker-prices.

    That's sooooooo sixties, maaaaaan!


    Actually I would say that's so 90s, man. The hippie values of the 60s as I remember them would never have embraced capitalism.

    Mind you they say if you remember the 60s you weren't there. I was born in the early 40s, so was never a hippie - so perhaps I am more likely to remember things as they were.

    But wake up, Cease2. RH - however old he is (if it matters) has every right to protect his business, and run it the way he wants to. Sites like BPT may well be 'very useful, freely-available & sociologically important' resources, but can't be allowed to deprive or detract from somebody else's core business and intellectual property rights.

    The other way is anarchy - which may look cool, until you find yourself on the wrong end of it.

    FrankM

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm fully awake thanks. And I do appreciate that copyright is important. I stand by my statement though, even if you want to misinterpret it.

    I'd disagree that Tobann's earning potential was threatened by BPT - quite the opposite, I believe. It surely complimented commercial products and aided in creating a market for them by showing what an interest subject Manson/Family is.

    I'd agree that showing wholesale portions of Tobann products is a violation and "wrong" though. As RH stated, that was not BPT, it was others on YT.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Panamint Patty said...
    This paragraph is damned near incoherent. He must be beside himself. And what's with the Jew talk again?

    what would this blog be without the occasional Jew talk???

    ReplyDelete
  16. That's a damn shame. Mr hendrickson, I wish you would have just contacted Michael. I'm sure he would have just deleted these 4 vids.

    I'm am very sorry it had to happen this way. I was planning on ordering your book and dvd package deal this month. Because of this new series of events, I have changed my mind. Í am always more than willing to pay for stuff like that, but I can't help but feel Mr. Hendrickson has fallen under the spell of the allmighty dollar.

    We now have to miss one of the greatest sources of CM Material on YT.

    Thanks again RH!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hendrickson:

    Apparently, the YouTube Copyright Agent decided to try and shift the blame for shutting down BackPorchTapes to Tobann International Pictures. Of course, if I had that kind of power you-all should be worshiping me instead of Charles Manson. Like I said, GOOGLE, Inc is terrified it will come out.  YouTube could be blacked-out in most of Europe when the Breivik / Manson connection is fully realized. And it's all right there in "DEATH TO PIGS"

    Helter Skelter was not about Black against White, but Christian against Muslim.  Ask Manson's personal spokesperson Sandy Good, "Islan is rising." I find it most interesting that apparently none of your bloggers "Get-it"  We're dealing with not only mass murder here, but international revolutions.  Your President Obama just ordered the assassination of the Muslim world's military leader. "Bin Laden" and all they can think about is where will I be able to get some more FREE stolen video tapes.

    Michael was a common thief. None of those videos were filmed by him, but even more significant HE personally screwed over Charles Manson. Those thousands of videos he posted made sure Manson will never win an appeal or be set free. The first thing Obama and the courts did was look-up on the internet what the Manson thing was all about today. I was the one that for years talked about the violation of Manson's right to represent himself in Court and now you-all want to shut me up? AND,  Mr. Bugliosi has been hard at work trying to discredit anyone who raises these delicate legal issues.

    Remember Susan Atkins? She thought she was telling the world how cool Charles Manson was, but she didn't even have enough awareness to understand that she was killing the one person she cherished the most. AND that is exactly what AC and most of you are doing: killing Manson's chances of ever getting out of prison.

    ReplyDelete
  18. even before BPT the film "MANSON" showed the girls with knives and guns (who set up these shots btw) nothing more could have ruined MAnson's release then showing the girls in set up film segments with guns clicking holding knives saying "IF they do anything to charlie they will have to deal with us" I think RH forgets how HE sensationalized the MAnson myth much more then BPT AC or anyone has and ruined Mansons chances for release

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mr. Hendrickson - Michael illegally used multiple segments of your property. In turn, you reported him multiple times. Consequently, his channel was closed. Everyone respects your right to report copyright infringement. In fact, everyone absolutely must, respect your right to report copyright infringement. It's the law. As Patty said, "copyright is copyright".
    You should have left things at that. The backpedaling and "posturing" you're doing now, is both pathetic and embarrassing. No one has ever exhausted more effort trying to profit from Charles Manson than you. That's a fact. Also, nothing has ever been more sensationalized, than your "Inside the Manson Gang" audio. From your movie = "fuck me, here comes Clem, the family's executioner, I'm outta here".
    You really should have just left well enough alone. I'm sure anyone with a brain, is losing respect for you. Beyond the obvious ethical aspect - insulting Mike even further, AC, and others, is not a good marketing strategy.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Michael's youtube channel had many hours of conversation with a lucid, coherant Manson discussing social and environmental issues as well as just day to day chitchat. They did much to portray Charlie in a postive light and not as the raving lunatic the media would have us believe.
    Any time far left or right groups attempt to attach their philsophical views to Manson they are simply connecting themselves to the "Manson myth" that Bugolsi has cultivated not to the man himself. Yet he is the one who suffers for it.
    To quote Charlie " I am your own reflection".
    Michael was Charlie's friend.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Asked Patty "And what's with the Jew talk again?"

    I believe he is referring to a person who is involved in ATWA who is of Jewish heritage. She is not Israeli, as in, being from the country.

    However, I do not believe she had anything to do with Michael being banned.

    Charles has nothing to do with what happened in Norway.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Wait a minute, I am "killing Manson's chance of ever getting out of prison"? WHAT?

    All I've ever done is point out all of the flaws and holes in the case, and promoted an ecological perspective, espoused by Manson, as well as others.

    All YOU have ever done, Mr. Hendrickson, is profiteer from Charles, the case, and his friends.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Said Adam: "Michael's youtube channel had many hours of conversation with a lucid, coherant Manson discussing social and environmental issues as well as just day to day chitchat."

    Absolutely. Please contrast these discussions of ATWA and current events with the heavily-edited, badly cut versions of Manson interviews shown in the conventional media.

    Michael hadn't any profit motive, thus, he hadn't any reason to sensationalize interviews and phone conversations with Charles.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Agrees with AC as I said before who set up these film segments with Brenda LYnn and Sandra clicking guns and holding knives as I recall this was RH...his film gained more popularity being banned in CA during LYnnettes trial in 1975 dont tell me he didnt relish the publicity he got from his film If he was worried of Charlies freedom he wont have made this propped up segments in the first place

    ReplyDelete
  25. rfoster1 said...
    Oy vey!
    *snicker*

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hendrickson:

    Here's my final post on the subject.

    I've been in contact with Michael / Manson's spokesperson. Apparently, its the "Bertice (BLACK) Berry Show" that got BackPorchTapes shut-down.

    All YouTube had to do was remove the 4 videos I complained about. BUT, IF you now look closely at how most bloggers were so quick to accuse me of being the "culprit" you should realize how easy it is for mob mentality to govern a society.

    At least now, because Ms Berry is "black", Helter Skelter can be resurrected. I suspect that U2 version of HS really did it for Michael. I mean the god "Bono" telling poor Michael that he's taking Helter Skelter BACK from Charles Manson, right when his precious "channel" falls under attack. Then at the same time, the Charles Manson of Norway (as he's been dubbed by the media) performs an act that makes poor Charlie look like a "poop-butt"

    To Candy & Nuts: You really made be realize how  personal perceptions can be totally misunderstood by the common man or those under the influence. IE: The scene in MANSON where Brenda, Squeaky and Sandy appear threatening with guns was done with Manson's blessing. He was just given the "DEATH" sentence and the girls wanted to make it clear that anyone who harmed Charlie would be in danger themselves. If you knew anything about the prison system, you would understand that Charlie was a "dead man walking" and that little public message likely saved Manson from a knife in the back. They were real "women" showing protection for their "man."  Something you never see today. All you had to do was read my book "Death to Pigs" and you might be able to understand the "truth."

    To my dear AC: THEY were "paid" handsomely with cold hard cash, "Just like little children, sneek'in all over the internet, try'in to knock-up mamma's attention." How embarrassing!

    ReplyDelete
  27. To Candy & Nuts: You really made be realize how personal perceptions can be totally misunderstood by the common man or those under the influence. -typical of someone like you RH deflect the truth off yourself by making some uneducated comment (those under the influence) you must have a long stretched arm from patting yourself on the back all these years-long arm short****ahem ahem thanks for the response

    ReplyDelete
  28. I'm not sure who to attribute this quote to, Matt or Hendrickson..."The scene in MANSON where Brenda, Squeaky and Sandy appear threatening with guns was done with Manson's blessing. He was just given the "DEATH" sentence and the girls wanted to make it clear that anyone who harmed Charlie would be in danger themselves."

    But, having watched the film several times with the aforementioned scene, and nowing a thing or two about firearms, it was painfully obvious Squeaky, Brenda, and Sandra knew NOTHING about firearms. It was funny watching Sandra pump that shotgun by holding the front slide with a stiff arm and using her right hand to pump the gun back and forth. The proper way is to hold the gun stationary and pump the slide back and forth to cycle a fresh round into the chamber.

    ReplyDelete
  29. @rfoster - When I have posted RH's comments I've never added my own. They are all his.

    ReplyDelete
  30. rfoster1 my point exactly defintely "set-up" segments whether RH wants to admit it or not maybe he doesnt remember at his age what happened or maybe like he said of me he was "under the influence" :)

    ReplyDelete
  31. Candy I think Robert would freely admit that some of the segments were set up to be more titillating. There is nothing else out there like his movie - three quarters documentary and one quarter art house. The only other movie Patty can think of that compares is Grey Gardens, which is also a masterpiece.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Patty I agree there IS nothing out there like this except maybe the home movies they made themselves which noone has ever been able to get a hold of however RH little comments about uner the influence and dopehead (BPT owner) isnt called for-only someone feeling threatened makes those types of comments sadly and makes people not want to buy more of RH work

    ReplyDelete
  33. btw I have recommended RH movie MAnson to many people and have also let many of them watch my own DVD of it~ is not like I'M trying to bash him~ belive me:)

    ReplyDelete
  34. looks like mr Drama Hendrickson bit off more than he can chew this time......I've seen at least two blogs now that are offering free downloads of his movies......Backporch had around 2000 peoploe looking at his site and instead of joining up and using it for advertising, since good ol' Rob is terrible at it, he dumps Backporch and gets downloaded and stolen from even more.......maybe it's his CRAZY postings about Norway and lnks and conspiracies, but Karma snatched his ass real quick.....maybe we should try for PEACE instead of trying to tear people down.....inmmy opinion Hendrickson is vaudeville and a poor carnie.....he gets what he deserves.....100 dollar book and 30 dollar dvd's trying to profit from off others and then hoarding things......Rob is a joke.....have a good life buddy......good luck makin a living off of something you did 40 years ago.....ADIOS

    ReplyDelete
  35. So Brad, tell us how you really feel about all of this...LOL

    ReplyDelete
  36. :) I'm a friend of Backporch and so there was some residual heat that came from all over the place.....there's a lot of emotion over ATWA (the group of people) and who ever talks to Michael.....I just contacted a guy online who had a common interest and went and hung out, hiking around around and goofing off....now it's turned into really nasty stuff being said back and forth.....my post reads more heated than I felt, I enjoy hendrickson's footage and I don't spread any free stuff (I was given my copies as a gift), but I've seen it just about everywhere on the internet for free, so I think he's fighting a losing war and trying to link Michael to the Norway killer is flat out ridiculous. I enjoy reading all your postings, I mean no ill will to anyone, you're kinda like celebrities on tv, since tv time is limited......PEACE & LOVE

    ReplyDelete
  37. Mr. Hendrickson initially told us Muslims were responsible for Mike's channel. The next day, he blamed it on blacks. Bertice BLACK Berry, to be exact. All the while, discussing Norway. The man is cracked.

    Yotube employs a "3 strikes, you're out" policy. The Colonel explained this himself, on his own blog, regarding his own Youtube closing. Tobann reported Mike for 4 violations, and 3 were confirmed. Case closed. Tobann was listed 3 times, on each of Mike's closed videos, and on Mike's closed channel for 24 hours. Tobann delivered the 3 necessary "blows" to close Mike down. Screenshots depicting Tobann's name, clearly listed THREE TIMES on all of Mike's closed videos, have already circulated around "MansonSpace" twice. Anyone who hasn't viewed those screenshots yet, is clearly out of the loop. There's nothing left to talk about.

    Hendrickson certainly hasn't been shy about insulting Michael, time and time again. So why all the 'cover-up" now? That's the only question left, worthy of asking. Maybe he feels accepting full blame, would negatively effect his precious sales.

    RH was at the right place, at the right time, with a camera. He's got a few hours of great Manson footage. Beyond that, he's produced, directed and authored nothing worthy of note in 42 years. If you subtract those 3 hours of Manson film, the guy's entire life and resume is blank. That's why, he's been trying desperately, to market the same shit in different forms and packages, over and over again. He clings to his 3 hours of Manson footage with bare white knuckles, because it's his only meal ticket. This week it's marketed as a dvd, next week it's a book, the next week it's a play. It's pathetic.

    Bradley, you were right-on with your first post. This man closed your friend's channel, and continues to insult him. Why you did a 180 is beyond me.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Liz, thank you for the compliment. Unfortunately, I can't take full credit for the name. My head, really is, shaped like a dick, and the name just stuck.

    ReplyDelete
  39. not really a 180 so much as a different window within the same house I think.....and I feel odd calling you dickhead and not feeling negatively towards you....X:). I just don't think the guy is all there, but I wanted to make sure all sides were shown within my argument....RH is a creepy guy who amped up the bullshit in his movie....they were cool, but they weren't real and he was taking advantage of people as far as I'm concerned....even if they were paid, which I doubt, it wasn't very much.......one thing I'm wondering....why is Matt posting for RH and not RH?.....seems a bit strange in my book....anyways....my two cents....lol...PEACE & LOVE

    ReplyDelete
  40. Patty is in a conspiracy theory mood tonight! Let's say that Robert is right, and Norway actually DID have something to do with Manson (in the killer's mind anyways)? If you were the authorities, would you make that be known and give Charlie more power in our collective consciousness, or would you keep it quiet so as not to draw any more attention to that little guy in the corner who keeps pushing all our buttons? "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"

    OK, Patty will go take her lithium now. Thank you for indulging her.

    ReplyDelete